Review and interview
This must be one of the gentlest western novels ever written about an Old West outlaw. Phil Truman takes the story of bank robber Henry Starr’s life and retells it as a lightly humorous, slightly quirky, and sometimes bittersweet tale of an otherwise decent man who happens to find his calling on the wrong side of the law.
This must be one of the gentlest western novels ever written about an Old West outlaw. Phil Truman takes the story of bank robber Henry Starr’s life and retells it as a lightly humorous, slightly quirky, and sometimes bittersweet tale of an otherwise decent man who happens to find his calling on the wrong side of the law.
A descendant of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma, Starr might
have lived his life differently. But despite his efforts to earn an honest
dollar, his natural gifts inclined him otherwise. Not that he was always lucky,
as the opening scene demonstrates. What starts out as a Dalton-style double
bank holdup in 1915 gets him shot and arrested. The novel closes with his last
turn of bad luck, shot again during another bank job in 1921, this time
fatally.
Starr, by Truman’s account, was also unlucky in love.
Married three times, he had no trouble charming the girls. But his inability to
support them, once wedded, kept his marriages brief.
Character. Calling
the novel a “Ballad” nicely describes its overall structure. Like the verses of
a long narrative folk song, the story Truman tells is not so much biographical
as it is a sequence of dramatic incidents portraying the character of the man.
What neither title nor subtitle reveals is the novel’s wry
humor. And much of it comes from Starr’s way of choosing to be amused by any
unexpected turn of events. An early attempt at robbing a train becomes a comedy
of errors, but while nearly everything goes wrong, the man remains a model of
grace under pressure.
Poster for movie about Starr, 1919 |
He is respectful of others, even as he’s robbing them. He
speaks calmly, assuring them that no one will be hurt, so there’s no reason to
be alarmed. Determined to be remembered as a professional and a gentleman, he
tells them his name while making off with the loot. He even gives a girl a
handful of quarters before one departure.
His nemesis in the novel is legendary lawman Bill Tilghman,
who had done much to clean up Oklahoma in the years following statehood.
Seeming to understand Starr’s basically well-mannered temperament, he treats
him with polite regard. He also gets Starr involved in a movie project,
reenacting one of his unsuccessful robberies, to show that crime doesn’t pay.
The only real villain of the story is hanging Judge Isaac
Parker of Fort Smith, Arkansas. The judge sentences Starr twice to the gallows
for the same crime and finally fails to see him executed, by dropping dead
himself before a final retrial. Also appearing in the novel is Comanche chief
Quanah Parker, who invites Starr into his home one night for a dinner of fresh
game.
Wrapping up. Truman
chooses as his central character a man who grew up a contemporary of Old West
outlaws and lived to a time when bank robberies made use of getaway cars. A
fugitive from justice much of his life, he spent only a handful of years behind
bars, always winning early parole by being a model prisoner.
You believe as surely as he does that he’ll never break the
law again when he’s released, but it’s hard for an Indian and an ex-con to find
a steady job. Eventually, a wife and child become a responsibility beyond his
means to support, and ill-gotten gains are too temptingly irresistible.
From beginning to end, Starr is a man who learns from his
mistakes, but what he learns is not of much use to him. And when his luck
finally runs out at the end, he accepts it without complaint. He only asks that
he be buried in the new suit he’s just bought, hoping the bloodstains won’t
show. The whole novel is like that, its wry humor unforced and always catching
you by surprise.
Red Lands Outlaw is
currently available in paper at amazon and Barnes&Noble and for the kindle.
Phil Truman |
Interview
Phil Truman has agreed to spend some time here today talking about writing and the writing of Red Lands Outlaw. So I'm turning the rest of this page over to him.
Phil, how do you define the “traditional western”?
I grew up in the era of TV westerns—Gun Smoke, Have Gun
Will Travel, Bonanza, Wagon Train, Rawhide,
and on and on. So for me a traditional western has, at a minimum, one good guy,
one bad guy, a good woman (or a good bad woman—see Kitty, Miss), perhaps some
Native Americans, several horses, cows, lots of dust, fist fights, an agreeable
amount of gunplay, and preferably some American history.
They’re usually morality plays—good vs. evil, right vs.
wrong. Two writers come to mind when I consider the traditional western novel:
Louis L’Amour and Larry McMurtry. One is the godfather of the American Western,
the other is the Homer. One defines the genre, the other carries it to epic
proportions.
Do you think of Red Lands Outlaw as an example of it?
According to the elements I listed above, I suppose Red
Lands Outlaw would fit the traditional
western category, but my gut feeling is, it’s not. I see it as more of a
character study, a biographical morality play, about a man cornered by societal
circumstances and making bad choices. Also, it’s my rookie attempt at writing a
western, so what do I know. I feel I have a lot to learn from those who write
westerns really well.
Belle Starr |
Talk about how the story of this novel suggested itself
and came to take shape for you.
Part of my my second novel, Legends of Tsalagee—a non-western, mystery, adventure—involves a
supposed lost treasure of Belle Starr. While doing research on Belle for that
novel, I ran across the account of Henry’s dual robberies of the banks in
Stroud, Oklahoma. That fascinated me, so I dug a little more. I used him as a
minor character in that second novel, and decided to make his biography my next
project for a historical western novel.
Did you have the title from the beginning, or did that
come later?
No, I had about fifteen working titles throughout the
writing of the book, even ran some of them by friends. Red Lands Outlaw was one of the finalists, but the secondary title, The
Ballad of Henry Starr, came to me the day
before I sent it off to my publisher. As far as I’m concerned titles are the
hardest part of writing a book.
What was involved in your research for the novel?
I’ve found that you can find out just about anything you
want to know on the Internet, and some of it is actually factual. One of the reasons
I gravitated to writing novels is because you can get away with making up most
of what you don’t know. Historical novels, on the other hand, do require a
certain responsibility to get most of your facts straight, especially
biographical work.
I did a fair amount of scouring old newspaper articles about
Henry Starr. The double bank robberies in Stroud, Oklahoma, were well
documented, and the movie he made was based on that event. I also found and
bought a copy of his autobiography. Interesting, though, that I found several
written “histories” with varying accounts of the same events, including names
of some of the principals in the stories. So I guess journalism hasn’t changed
all that much over the years.