Review and interview
Tom Rizzo has taken
three unsolved mysteries from the 1860s and woven them into a story of
espionage and criminality. His central character is an innocent man, just doing
his job, who becomes a wanted fugitive.
Plot. Grant Bonner is a young Civil War veteran who
has been a spy for the Union in the Confederate South. As the war ends, he is
put on the trail of a colonel in the Union Army suspected of engineering the
robbery of a gold shipment. Accompanying five heavy coffins in the express car
of a westbound train from Cincinnati,
Bonner is surprised by a derailment that leaves him running for his life
from thieves.
Thus begins a
complex story extending over several years and told from the point of view of
20 or more characters, including men who are plotting against Bonner.
Eventually working with him to unmask the villain they’ve both been after is a
young black officer, David Webster.
The story takes them
to Bitter Creek, Wyoming, where Bonner is cowboying under an assumed name for
reasons I’ll leave it to readers to discover. Under suspicion is an ambitious
local rancher who has acquired a big spread and seems to have enough money to
buy up most of the town. In a plot twist that involves the theft of a valuable
document, he is about to become even richer.
 |
| Union soldier, photo by Mathew Brady |
Character. Grounded as it is in actual though
little-known events, the story is a departure from what is thought of as the
“traditional” western. Characters come and go, and new ones are still being
introduced in the final chapters. While Bonner is the main character, he is absent from about a third of the
book, which has an interesting effect.
He is often unaware
of developments that the reader has already been informed of, and his welfare
is far more precarious than he knows. On the other hand, his training as a spy
comes to his aid as he thwarts an ambush, studying the lay of the terrain and
divining where a shooter might be hiding if he cared to.
Curious is the
absence of a single romantic interest for Bonner. Instead, there is not one but
three women who figure into the plot, each of them taking a shine to him and
helping him out of a jam. Each teases a reciprocal twinge of interest from him,
but at the end he is still on his own and apparently OK with that.
There’s not a lot of
back-story for Bonner, but Rizzo does describe a boyhood incident that casts a
shadow over him. A young friend was killed one day as the two of them handled a
loaded revolver. Feeling responsible for the boy’s death, he is haunted years
later, especially as he feels angry impulses to use his own gun.
 |
| Still from The Great Train Robbery, 1903 |
The most interesting
creation is the black officer, David Webster. Outside of David Cranmer’s U.S.
Marshal, Gideon Miles, it’s unusual to find an African American in a western
story. Webster is a sharply intelligent man and in full possession of his
authority, despite any prejudices working against him.
For villains, it’s
hard to beat Marcus Steele, who is not just a greedy man with a criminal mind.
He has a contempt for other people, including his own wife, that is blood
curdling. Steele is the kind of villain often found in early westerns, an
ambitious man intent on getting rich quick, by any means, and entertaining
schemes to buy his way into public office.
Wrapping up. Rizzo has constructed an intricately contrived
western tale. The shifting points of view bring even minor characters to life
during their brief moments in the narrative. The train robbery and Bonner’s
final confrontation with Steele are nicely suspenseful. Last Stand at Bitter
Creek is currently available
at amazon and Barnes&Noble and for kindle and the nook. You can learn more
about Tom Rizzo at his website.
Interview
 |
| Tom Rizzo |
Tom Rizzo has
generously agreed to spend some time here today at BITS to talk about writing
and his novel. I’m turning the rest of this page over to him.
How did the idea for Last
Stand at Bitter Creek suggest
itself to you?
I read a short paragraph about the first peacetime robbery
in the US taking place in North Bend, Ohio, just outside Cincinnati. If you
Google first “train robbery”, you’ll find the Reno Brothers robbed an Ohio
& Mississippi train October 6, 1886—the first time a “moving” train was
stopped and robbed. The Pinkertons finally solved the case.
But, the truth is an Ohio & Mississippi train was
robbed May 5, 1865, and derailed outside North Bend. I wrote an article on it
that was published by Wild West Magazine
in October 1995. This case was never solved. A few years later, I thought since
the case was never solved, what if the train was transporting a valuable cargo
no one knew about.
Is the published version
similar to how you first conceived it or somewhat different?
It is somewhat different. A rough chapter-by-chapter
outline got me started, but then new elements came into play and I made major
changes along the way.
What sort of research was
involved in writing the novel?
Quite a bit of research, not only about the historical
incidents I included, but about that particular period of history as far as how
people lived, worked, what they wore, how did they travel, what did they eat. A
lot, of course, was never used but was necessary to know to get a sense of time
and place.
Talk a bit about editing
and revising. After completing a first draft, did it go through any key changes?
It probably took me nine months to write the first draft.
And it underwent several revisions. The biggest one, ironically, was after I
sent it to a professional editor. She made excellent suggestions and pointed
out some pitfalls, and made the appropriate edits, and put it to rest for a
couple of weeks to let it marinade a little.
At that point, it was 80,000 words. When I returned to it,
read it again from beginning to end, and carved out about 10,000 words that I
thought slowed things down too much.
Was there anything about
the story that surprised you in the writing of it?
How difficult it was to write a novel with such an
involved storyline. I also discovered how much fun I had at creating different
characters, slipping into their skin, and trying to think and act as they
might.
What parts of the novel
gave you the most pleasure to write?
I enjoyed so many parts of it, including the interplay
between the newspaper publisher and his daughter... the characters who played
the role of lawmen... the strength of the three major female characters... the
pairing of Bonner and Webster... the evil and single-mindedness of the
antagonist... and David Webster’s reaction to the shootout he was involved
in.