Myth vs. reality. Mulford has a reputation for historical accuracy. Tuska and Piekarski, in the Encyclopedia of Western and Frontier Literature make note of his “vast library” of sources. But a reader gets the feeling in this novel that Mulford is relying a lot on guesswork and dubious assumptions.
I said yesterday that he was born in Illinois, which is true, but he seems to have grown up in Brooklyn, NY. Many western writers born elsewhere who fell in love with the West eventually settled there. But Mulford didn't visit the West until he was 41 years old. Then he moved even farther away, living the rest of his life in Maine.
I said yesterday that he was born in Illinois, which is true, but he seems to have grown up in Brooklyn, NY. Many western writers born elsewhere who fell in love with the West eventually settled there. But Mulford didn't visit the West until he was 41 years old. Then he moved even farther away, living the rest of his life in Maine.
In Bar-20 he provides an accurate description of a spring roundup and how calves are branded. He explains the work of riding the line and the purpose of line cabins. He has Hopalong lecture a female companion on the many uses of mesquite. But he doesn’t relay much of the real work of cowboying.
His cowboys go into town to hang out in the saloon about every night. They have long vacations that permit them to roam like knights errant around the Southwest and into Mexico. On leave like this, they might try a hand at mining for gold. As a fraternity of mostly young males, they resemble a kind of Animal House in boots and chaps.
The outfits on the far-flung ranches, we learn, communicate with each other by smoke signals. There’s always a first time to run across a little known historical fact, but I have my doubts about the accuracy of this one.
What Mulford did understand was the ethos of the West. This is a long quote, from chapter 4, but what he says about the mythic West is right on the money:
A man was only a man when he had the qualities necessary; and the illiterate who could ride and shoot and live to himself was far more esteemed than the educated who could not do those things. The more a man depends upon himself and the closer is his contact to a quick judgment the more laconic and even-poised he becomes. And the knowledge that he is himself a judge tends to create caution and judgment. He has no court to uphold his honor and to offer him protection, so he must be quick to protect himself and to maintain his own standing.
His nature saved him, or it executed; and the range absolved him of all unpaid penalties of a careless past. He became a man born again and he took up his burden, the exactions of a new environment, and he lived as long as those actions gave him the right to live. He must tolerate no restrictions of his natural rights, and he must not restrict; for the one would proclaim him a coward, the other a bully, and both received short shrifts in the land of the self-protected. The basic law of nature is the survival of the fittest.
There’s a direct line between Mulford’s words here and the men who walked the pages of westerns during the century that followed.




