This was Elmore Leonard’s first published novel, written in his late twenties. In it, already fully developed, is the trademark edge that he brings to his fiction. With its
opening scene in a barbershop in Contention, Arizona, we get just that—an
exchange of contentious dialogue that’s both bristling and funny. It’s the same
mastery of verbal dispute between people at sharp odds with each other that
makes “Justified” so much fun today.
Plot. Leonard’s central character is an Army scout,
Dave Flynn, who escorts a fresh young lieutenant south of the border to bring
back a renegade Apache chief. Flynn is a Civil War veteran who resigned his
commission, disillusioned after witnessing a commanding officer’s act of cowardice.
For the lieutenant, Bowers, the story tells of a fledgling officer learning how
to use his wits and his own natural cunning instead of going by the book.
In Mexico, a bounty is being paid for Apache scalps. What the two men
find is a gang of norteamericanos who are killing Mexicans and
presenting their scalps for payment by chief of rurales, Lamas Duro. The rurales are a police force made up chiefly of untrained law enforcers and former bandits.
Duro is a contemptible, terrified man, subduing his fears with steady drinking.
The gang leader, Curt Lazair, is a soulless murderer of innocents, who has
taken a young woman captive and is keeping her at the gang’s hideout.
Flynn rescues the
girl. Meanwhile, Bowers discovers that Duro’s second in command, a veteran of the
revolt against the French, is shamed by how he is being used as an instrument
of injustice and incompetence. The novel’s climax involves both an Apache
attack and armed retaliation by the men of the village against Duro. Motivation
for all that happens in the closing chapters produces awkward and not so
plausible complications.
Character. Flynn makes an enjoyable hero, much as Raylan
Givens in “Justified.” He is sharply intelligent and steady, an individual too
independent to take orders from men he can’t respect. He is his own authority,
with a knowledge of the world and others learned the hard way. Yet he doesn’t
venture all that far from social connections. Unwilling to give himself to a
career in the Army, he still accepts a job as a scout for that same
organization.
Flynn has seen it
all. He’s witnessed the dishonorable behavior of men, shirking duty with
impunity. Though disillusioned he could be utterly cynical, but he’s not. There
is a man or two he still admires. Chief of scouts, Joe Madora, is one of them. He
is astute, trustworthy, and a reliable friend. He also has a sense of
humor. The Indian chief, Soldado Viejo, also wins Flynn’s respect. When the two
meet, the scene evolves into a long match of wits that ends at best in a draw.
While Flynn has his own code of honor, he faults himself for being a quitter. At one time, he might have held others to a higher standard of conduct, but he walked away instead. Thus he makes a curious choice at the end of the novel that allows Bowers to retain a measure of his youthful idealism.
The villains of the
novel are real sleaze bags, as they are in “Justified.” Duro is cowardly and despicable.
Lazair is a psychopath, who “believed in little and trusted even less.” An
interesting invention is Frank Rellis, who challenges Flynn in chapter 1 over
occupation of a barber chair. Thinking he can interrupt Flynn’s haircut at the
point of a gun, he gets kicked into the street after a sharp exchange of
words.
Later on, in Sonora,
Rellis appears again and makes more trouble, this time with Bowers in a
taverna. The stakes are higher this time and after more high-tension dialogue,
the results are fatal for him. Rellis is such a nasty, pathetic foil for the
likes of Bowers and Flynn, you can actually miss him when he’s gone.
Style. The novel is enjoyable as an early attempt at
long-form fiction by a writer who became a master of it. Besides the dialogue,
the action is often—though not always—crisply described. Leonard has said that he writes stories that come out of the characters, and while the characters in this novel are fully realized, the plot tends to meander at times. The characters, in fact, are most alive when they are talking. In action, they sometimes lose focus as they are being shuffled about by the plot.
The story is told
from a half dozen points of view. Scenes occasionally shift into stream of
conscious as a character ponders a situation. Here Bowers puzzles over Flynn:
Flynn can
almost convince you that he’s right even before he says one word. It’s his
manner. The way he goes about things. He doesn’t get excited. He seems
absolutely perfectly honest with himself; that’s why you believe what he says.
Leonard’s
descriptive style is spare and economical. However, he does not yet observe his
well-known injunction against adverbs. In this novel, readers are likely to
find them, as in this example: “Bowers said something in a low voice and he
looked at Hilario embarrassedly. Flynn looked at Bowers curiously.” You’ll even
find an occasional “suddenly.”
Leonard treats the death of characters with more affect than is typically found in westerns. When survivors learn of the deaths of family and loved ones, he makes an honest effort to describe the onset of grief. Later, after killing one of the Apaches, Flynn regards the body of the man with sorrow.
Wrapping up. This is definitely one for Elmore Leonard fans.
Readers can find early evidence of the man’s storytelling skill, particularly
in characterization. Instructive for writers is the way characters reveal
themselves through dialogue, especially when it is a battle of wits, which is
usually the case. As in “Justified,” outlaws may be criminal, but the worst
crime is to be ignorant.
The Bounty
Hunters is currently available
at amazon, Barnes&Noble, and AbeBooks and for kindle and the nook. For more
of Friday’s Forgotten Books, click on over to Patti Abbott’s blog.
Source: Tuska and Piekarski, Encyclopedia of
Frontier and Western Fiction,
1983
Image credits:
elmoreleonard.com
coverbrowser.com
thedustyloft.com
Coming up: Helen Hunt Jackson, Ramona (1884)
A fine review. The early work of a gifted novelist is always interesting, and your comparisons of early and late Leonard are absorbing. I could show you early novels filled with practices I now abhor (such as the use of exotic utterance verbs to replace "said").
ReplyDeleteI get your point, Richard, though sometimes one of those exotic utterances gets just the right tone. I actually stretched Leonard's rule about adverbs, as I think most people do who cite it. He was referring specifically to adverbs used to modify "said."
DeleteBased on the ones I've read, I honestly think Leonard's westerns are even better than his later crime novels. I'm going to have to get to this one soon. Great review.
ReplyDeleteReading the westerns, you begin to see how the two genres have merged in "Justified."
DeleteI'll have to see if I can pick this one up. I've heard of it but never seen it.
ReplyDeleteHarperTorch released a bunch (if not all) of his western novels in paperback about 10 years ago. I found them at a paperback exchange when I was in Olympia, Washington.
DeleteI've read Leonard's complete Western short stories, which I thought were terrific. I agree, his characters and sharp dialogue are some of the best elements. I'm planning to try one of his Western novels one of these days, and see how it compares—I'm interested to see what he does with a longer story.
ReplyDeleteI picked up a handful of them (as I mentioned above to Charles Gramlich) and plan to work through them in chronological order for reviews here. I'm curious to see how he gets better at plot development. I thought that was the weakest part of this novel.
DeleteA quick thought for the master himself, who is recovering from a stroke in hospital. Get well soon Mr. Leonard.
ReplyDeleteI'll second that.
DeleteHaven't read this one, but the changes in word use in the later stories may be an adaptation to popular use of the times or maybe a learning experience. I wish Mr. Leonard well in his recovery.
ReplyDeleteDollars to donuts, it's learning from experience.
Delete